DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 3 of 3

1
Evaluating arguments from the reaction of the audience
In: Thinking & reasoning. - Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 18 (2012) 3, 365-378
OLC Linguistik
Show details
2
Looking for arguments
In: Argumentation. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer Science+Business Media 26 (2012) 3, 305-324
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
3
Some Clarifications About the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: A Reply to Santibáñez Yañez (2012).
In: Informal Logic ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00907813 ; Informal Logic, 2012, 32 (2), pp 256-265 (2012)
Abstract: International audience ; In "Mercier and Sperber's Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies" (2012) Cristian Santibáñez Yañez offers an interesting take on a new theory of reasoning put forward by Dan Sperber and myself. 1 His comments are especially interesting since they come from the perspective of argumentation studies ("traditionally dialectics, rhetoric and (informal) logic," 155), a field that Santibáñez Yañez contends has been neglected in this novel theory. After very briefly summarizing the main idea of the argumentative theory of reasoning and clarifying some points for which Santibáñez Yañez may not be offering an entirely accurate representation, the present article will offer a suggestion regarding the potential for mutual enrichment between argumentation studies and the argumentative theory of reasoning.
Keyword: [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology; argumentation; reasoning
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00907813
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00907813/document
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00907813/file/Mercier-some-clarifications.pdf
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
1
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern