4 |
The Processing of Verb-Argument Constructions is Sensitive to Form, Function, Frequency, Contingency, and Prototypicality.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Second Language Verb-Argument Constructions are Sensitive to Form, Function, Frequency, Contingency, and Prototypicality.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Bridging the Gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners" knowledge of verb-argument constructions.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Does language Zipf right along? Investigating robustness in the latent structures of usage and acquisition.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
An eye-tracking study of learned attention in Second Language Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Second Language Learner Knowledge of Verb–Argument Constructions: Effects of Language Transfer and Typology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency and prototypicality
|
|
|
|
In: Cognitive Linguistics. - 25, 1 (2014) , ISSN: 1613-3641 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
BRIDGING THE GAP
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Second Language Acquisition. - 36, 03 (2014) , 361-421, ISSN: 0272-2631 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|