3 |
Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Wait a second! Delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Information integration in modulation of pragmatic inferences during online language comprehension ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Effects of Subject-Case Marking on Agreement Processing: ERP evidence from Basque ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The Timing of Lexical Memory Retrievals in Language Production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual lexical decision is influenced by stimulus list composition ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Cognates share their form and meaning across languages: “winter” in English means the same as “winter” in Dutch. Research has shown that bilinguals process cognates more quickly than words that exist in one language only (e.g. “ant” in English). This finding is taken as strong evidence for the claim that bilinguals have one integrated lexicon and that lexical access is language non-selective. Two English lexical decision experiments with Dutch-English bilinguals investigated whether the cognate facilitation effect is influenced by stimulus list composition. In Experiment 1, the ‘standard’ version, which included only cognates, English control words and regular non-words, showed significant cognate facilitation (31 ms). In contrast, the ‘mixed’ version, which also included interlingual homographs, pseudohomophones (instead of regular non-words) and Dutch-only words, showed a significantly different profile: a non-significant disadvantage for the cognates (8 ms). Experiment 2 examined the specific impact of ...
|
|
Keyword:
FOS Languages and literature; FOS Psychology; Linguistics; Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics; Psychology; Social and Behavioral Sciences
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/rvmz3 https://osf.io/rvmz3/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
The Malleability of Linguistic Representations Poses a Challenge to the Priming-based Experimental Approach. Commentary on Branigan & Pickering (2017) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Is infant-directed speech interesting because it is surprising? – Linking properties of IDS to statistical learning and attention at the prosodic level ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Comprehending underspecified meaning: resolving ambiguity by contextual and conceptual search ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
What is in a name? The Development of Cross-Cultural Differences in Referential Intuitions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Real-time lexical comprehension in young children learning American Sign Language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Production planning and comprehension are not carried out in parallel ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The effect of prominence and cue association in retrieval processes: A computational account ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Asymmetric accommodation during interaction leads to the regularisation of linguistic variants ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The Lexical Bias Effect during Speech Production in the First and Second Language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Commentary on Branigan and Pickering: Don’t shoot the giant whose shoulders we are standing on. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|