1 |
Subjective assertions are weak: Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Decomposing cornering effects: an experimental study
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 22 Nr. 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 175-190 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 22 No 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 175-190 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Subjective assertions are weak: Exploring the illocutionary profile of perspective-dependent predicates
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 22 Nr. 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 160-173 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 22 No 1 (2018): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22; 160-173 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
From Totally Dark to Totally Old. The Formal Semantics of Subjectification.
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 125-142 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 125-142 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Is 'good' better than 'excellent'? An experimental investigation on scalar implicatures and gradable adjectives
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 17 (2013): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17; 81-98 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 17 (2013): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17; 81-98 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Great pizzas, ghost negations: The emergence and persistence of mixed expressives
|
|
|
|
In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 143-160 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 19 (2015): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19; 143-160 ; 2629-6055 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Conveying emphasis for intensity : Lexical and syntactic strategies
|
|
|
|
In: Language and Linguistics Compass ; 13 (2019), 7. - e12343. - eISSN 1749-818X (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Emphasis is a widely investigated notion in linguistics. In this article, we focus on emphasis for intensity, a general linguistic strategy whereby linguistic objects are given prominence by virtue of being selected from the upper range of a scale. We consider two linguistic domains where emphasis for intensity can be observed: the lexical domain, where it is conveyed via a variety of intensifiers, and the domain of syntax, where it can be conveyed via different types of non‐canonical word order. While distinct in many respects, such families of constructions can be seen as conveying a unified effect, raising a number of issues concerning how the relation between emphasis and scalarity is best captured across languages and constructions. ; published
|
|
Keyword:
ddc:400
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12343 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-k0wv3i5prxys3
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
Default agreement with subjective assertions
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 29; 82-102 ; 2163-5951 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|