DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 7 of 7

1
Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers
In: Reading and writing. - New York, NY : Springer Science+Business Media 26 (2013) 7, 1059-1086
OLC Linguistik
Show details
2
Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers
BASE
Show details
3
Reliability and Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Median and Mean Scores Among Middle Grade Readers When Using Equated Texts
In: Reading psychology. - Philadelphia, Pa. : Taylor & Francis 33 (2012) 1, 133-161
OLC Linguistik
Show details
4
The Relations Among Oral and Silent Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Middle School: Implications for Identification and Instruction of Students With Reading Difficulties
BASE
Show details
5
Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention
BASE
Show details
6
A test of the cerebellar hypothesis of dyslexia in adequate and inadequate responders to reading intervention
BASE
Show details
7
A Response to Recent Reanalyses of the National Reading Panel Report: Effects of Systematic Phonics Instruction Are Practically Significant
Abstract: The authors examine the reassessments of the National Reading Panel (NRP) report (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000) by G. Camilli, S. Vargas, and M. Yurecko (2003); G. Camilli, P. M. Wolfe, and M. L. Smith (2006); and D. D. Hammill and H. L. Swanson (2006) that disagreed with the NRP on the magnitude of the effect of systematic phonics instruction. Using the coding of the NRP studies by Camilli et al. (2003, 2006), multilevel regression analyses show that their findings do not contradict the NRP findings of effect sizes in the small to moderate range favoring systematic phonics. Extending Camilli et al. (2003, 2006), the largest effects are associated with reading instruction enhanced with components that increase comprehensiveness and intensity. In contrast to Hammill and Swanson, binomial effect size displays show that effect sizes of the magnitude found for systematic phonics by the NRP are meaningful and could result in significant improvement for many students depending on the base rate of struggling readers and the size of the effect. Camilli et al. (2003, 2006) and Hammill and Swanson do not contradict the NRP report, concurring in supporting comprehensive approaches to reading instruction.
Keyword: Article
URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.123
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024599
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258576
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern