| 1 |
The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework
|
|
|
|
In: EISSN: 1664-1078 ; Frontiers in Psychology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02290943 ; Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers, 2019, Exploring the Nature, Content, and Frequency of Intrapersonal Communication, 10, pp.2019. ⟨10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019⟩ ; https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Orofacial electromyographic correlates of induced verbal rumination
|
|
|
|
In: Embodied and Situated Language Processing: Stepping out of the Frame (ESLP 2015) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01250854 ; Embodied and Situated Language Processing: Stepping out of the Frame (ESLP 2015), Jul 2015, Lyon, France. 2015 ; http://eslp2015.sciencesconf.org/program (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Neural correlates of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1065-9471 ; EISSN: 1097-0193 ; Human Brain Mapping ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00762363 ; Human Brain Mapping, Wiley, 2012, 34 (10), pp.2574-2591. ⟨10.1002/hbm.22090⟩ (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Corrélats neurocognitifs de la perception de la focalisation prosodique contrastive en français
|
|
|
|
In: Actes des XXVIIIèmes JEP 2010 ; JEP 2010 - 28e Journées d'Etudes sur la Parole ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537231 ; JEP 2010 - 28e Journées d'Etudes sur la Parole, May 2010, Mons, Belgique (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Bilateral auditory and left-dominant premotor activity in prosodic focus processing
|
|
|
|
In: OHBM 2010 - 16th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537230 ; OHBM 2010 - 16th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Jun 2010, Barcelone, Spain (2010)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; Introduction: Contrastive focus is used to emphasize a constituent in an utterance as opposed to another. In French, it can be conveyed by prosody using a specific intonational contour on the constituent pointed at (THOMASF a mangé la pomme. 'THOMASF ate the apple.'). The studies of the neural correlates of the perception of prosody have led to different conclusions (see Baum et al., 1199 for a review). Early works claimed that prosody is processed in the right hemisphere (e.g. Brådvik et al., 1991). Other studies have shown that prosodic processing cannot be restricted to the right hemisphere, however (e.g. Astésano et al.,2004). In this framework, this fMRI study deals with the perception of prosodic contrastive focus in French, according to the hemispheric specialization. Methods: An fMRI experiment was performed on 22 French adults (all were right-handed according to Oldfield, 1971). Two conditions were compared: 'sentences with narrow contrastive focus' (Focus condition, F) and 'sentences with broad focus' (Neutral condition, N). All sentences had the same syntactic and syllabic structure (e.g., 'Thomas cassait le vélo'. 'Thomas broke the bike'). The subjects were asked to judge whether the audio stimuli contained contrastive focus. The responses were recorded and the performance of task execution was evaluated. Functional MR imaging was performed on a Bruker 3T MR imager. Data analyses were performed by using SPM5 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). A random-effect group analysis on the F vs. N contrast images from individual analyses by using a one-sample t-test has been subsequently performed. We identified clusters of activated voxels (p < 0.001, uncorrected, height threshold: T = 3.53, K > 15). In addition, we defined seven Regions of Interest based on the whole-brain activation obtained by contrasting F vs. N in all subjects. ROIs were delineated in the left and right hemispheres symmetrically. For each ROI, the parameter estimates values were analyzed by means of a repeated ANOVA with hemisphere as a within-subject factor. Results: Behavioral responses obtained during the fMRI experiment were correct on most trials: Focus (M = 92.99%, SD = 6.73%) and Neutral (N = 97.72 %, SD = 3.85%). Our fMRI results showed significant left hemisphere predominance of the inferior frontal (BA 47) and supramarginal (BA 40) gyri, as well as for left anterior insula (BA 13) in the F vs. N contrast (c.f. Figure 1). Conclusions: Contrary to many brain imaging studies, these results suggest that both hemispheres participate in the auditory perception of prosody, but with a left-dominant contribution for morpho-syntactic processes and thematic role monitoring.
|
|
Keyword:
[SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/Neuroscience; [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology; [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537230
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Who ate the candy? Neural processing of prosodic contrastive focus.
|
|
|
|
In: NLC 2010 - 2nd Annual Neurobiology of Language Conference ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537234 ; NLC 2010 - 2nd Annual Neurobiology of Language Conference, Nov 2010, San Diego, Californie, United States (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Neural correlates of the perception of prosodic focus in French: An fMRI study
|
|
|
|
In: CNS 2010 - 17th Annual Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537235 ; CNS 2010 - 17th Annual Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting, Apr 2010, Montréal, Canada. pp.n.c (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
An fMRI study of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French
|
|
|
|
In: Speech Prosody 2010 - 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00537232 ; Speech Prosody 2010 - 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, May 2010, Chicago, United States. pp.n.c (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
