• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword:
    
    • Risk Assessment (4)
    • Dialectical Argumentation (3)
    • Inference (3)
    • Qualitative Reasoning (3)
    • Argumentation (1)
    • Computational Dialectics (1)
    • Hypothesis Tests (1)
    • KEY WORDS (1)
    • Precautionary Principle (1)
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Simon Parsons (4)
    • The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives (4)
    • Peter Mcburney (3)
    • Peter McBurney (1)
  • 
    Year:
    
    • 2001 (2)
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access:
    • free (4)
    • subject to license (0)

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 4 of 4 1 Dialectical Argumentation for Reasoning About Chemical . . . Peter McBurney; Simon Parsons In: http://www3.oup.co.uk/igpl/Volume_09/Issue_02/ps/McBurney.ps.gz (2001) Abstract: We aim to build intelligent systems which can reason autonomously about the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Scientific debates in this area draw on evidence from multiple, and often conicting sources, both theoretical and experimental, and participants use various modes of inferential reasoning. In seeking to automate such reasoning, we have first articulated precisely the multiple modes of inference used when an assertion of human carcinogenicity is made from experimental animal evidence. Because such inferences are often contested, scientific debate in this domain can be vigorous. To model such debates, we propose the use of a form of dialectical argumentation, drawing on Habermas' philosophy of Discourse Ethics [9] and Pera's philosophy of science [18]. The resulting formalism permits the representation of uncertainty and disagreement regarding the modes of inference used, as well as the claims being asserted. Keyword: Dialectical Argumentation; Inference; Qualitative Reasoning; Risk Assessment URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.11.323 http://www3.oup.co.uk/igpl/Volume_09/Issue_02/ps/McBurney.ps.gz BASE Hide details 2 Dialectical Argumentation for Reasoning about Chemical Carcinogenicity Peter Mcburney; Simon Parsons In: http://www3.oup.co.uk/igpl/Volume_09/Issue_02/pdf/McBurney.pdf (2001) BASE Show details 3 Dialectical Argumentation for Reasoning about Chemical Carcinogenicity Peter Mcburney; Simon Parsons In: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~peter/downloads/fapr2000.ps BASE Show details 4 Determining Error Bounds for Hypothesis Tests in Risk Assessment: A Research Agenda Peter Mcburney; Simon Parsons In: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~peter/downloads/lpr.ps BASE Show details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 4 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0