DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 9 of 9

1
Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman
BASE
Show details
2
Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman ...
Zhang, Rainie Minghao. - : Columbia University, 2019
BASE
Show details
3
Zhōng Jiè Yǔ Yǔ Yán Xué Duō Wéi Yán Jiū [Multidimensional Studies in Interlanguage Linguistics]
Li, Shaopeng. - 2017
BASE
Show details
4
Zhōng Jiè Yǔ Yǔ Yán Xué Duō Wéi Yán Jiū [Multidimensional Studies in Interlanguage Linguistics] ...
Li, Shaopeng. - : Columbia University, 2017
BASE
Show details
5
Second Language Acquisition of Korean Case by Learners with Different First Languages
Ahn, Hyunjung. - 2015
BASE
Show details
6
Another Look at Norris and Ortega (2000)
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 15-38 (2015) (2015)
Abstract: Since Norris and Ortega’s (2000) seminal work on the effectiveness of second language instruction, there has been a proliferation of meta-analyses in the field of applied linguistics. Subsequent meta-analysts, however, have uncritically followed the methodological choices made by Norris and Ortega. This paper suggests a critical reevaluation of the methodological procedures underlying the Norris and Ortega (2000) meta-analysis. I reexamined their procedures, and reassessed the 49 unique samples they used in their meta-analysis. In doing so, I identified three key methodological limitations with the study, pertaining, respectively, to (a) the data collection procedure, (b) the coding system, and (c) the statistical analysis. I argue that the lack of data quality inherent in the primary studies, the oversimplified coding scheme, and the inappropriate use of effect size statistics combine to compromise the validity of the conclusions Norris and Ortega have drawn from their meta-analysis. I subsequently provide alternative procedures which may yield a more empirically sound research synthesis, recommending, for future meta-analysts, the “best evidence synthesis‟ approach where conclusions are drawn from combining quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Keyword: Applied linguistics; Education; English language; Foreign speakers; Language acquisition; Linguistics; Meta-analysis; Methodilogy; P118-118.7; PE1-3729; Research; Second language acquisition; SLA
URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/D84M9H5B
https://doaj.org/article/b5d37580dff442b387b27c5e97394aaf
BASE
Hide details
7
Input for the Second Language Classroom: Some Innovations and Insights
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 54-56 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
8
Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 82-85 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
9
Enhancing the Role of Meaning in the L2 Classroom: A Cognitive Linguistics Perspective
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 51-53 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
9
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern