| 1 |
Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 72-76 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Filling In the Missing Piece in Research on Lexicalization Patterns
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 52-54 (2015) (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
For more than a decade, studies on second language (L2) lexicalization patterns of motion events have examined crosslinguistic differences in encoding semantic elements (e.g., motions, paths, manners) into surface forms (e.g., verbs, prepositions, adverbial clauses). Ultimately, these studies examine the transferability of the L1 form-meaning relationships to interlangauge (IL), claiming that there is an underlying influence of first language (L1) based cognition on L2 acquisition (for a review of previous studies, see Slobin, 2004). This claim of L1 cognitive influence arose from the perspective of linguistic relativity, specifically from Slobin’s (1996) thinking for speaking hypothesis, which asserts that linguistic demands influence how speakers conceptualize motion events.
|
|
Keyword:
Applied linguistics; English language; Interlanguage; L1; L2; Language acquisition; Lexicalization; Lexicology; P118-118.7; PE1-3729; Second language acquisition - research; SLA
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-2qcg-x206
https://doaj.org/article/89d335cd609746aab1c5cf6481df364f
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Talmy’s Dichotomous Typology and Japanese Lexicalization Patterns of Motion Events
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 29-47 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
