| 1 |
Stance classification of Twitter debates: The encryption debate as a use case
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Social media have enabled a revolution in user-generated content. They allow users to connect, build community, produce and share content, and publish opinions. To better understand online users’ attitudes and opinions, we use stance classification. Stance classification is a relatively new and challenging approach to deepen opinion mining by classifying a user's stance in a debate. Our stance classification use case is tweets that were related to the spring 2016 debate over the FBI’s request that Apple decrypt a user’s iPhone. In this “encryption debate,” public opinion was polarized between advocates for individual privacy and advocates for national security. We propose a machine learning approach to classify stance in the debate, and a topic classification that uses lexical, syntactic, Twitter-specific, and argumentative features as a predictor for classifications. Models trained on these feature sets showed significant increases in accuracy relative to the unigram baseline. ; Open
|
|
Keyword:
Argumentative features; Natural language processing; Stance classification; Supervised machine learning
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097288
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/96250
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
