• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher
  • 
    Year:
    
    • 2016 (28)
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 Hits 1 – 20 of 28 1 What’s Your Type? Readability of Fonts Across Native and Non-Native English Speakers Eldar, Maayan In: Senior Projects Spring 2016 (2016) Abstract: This study asks whether people with different native languages perceive the readability of serif fonts (fonts with finishing off strokes) and sans serif fonts (fonts without finishing off strokes) differently. In addition, because well-controlled research on the readability of serif and sans serif fonts is scarce, this research serves as a conceptual replication of Moret-Tatay & Perea’s (2011) study that suggests that sans serif fonts are the more readable font type. In Experiment 1, native English, native Korean, and native Chinese speakers completed an online English lexical decision task (a word/pseudoword recognition task) in a serif and a sans serif font. In Experiment 2, native English and native Chinese speakers completed the same lexical decision task in a more controlled laboratory setting. I hypothesized that the sans serif font will be the most readable font type across native languages. More specifically, I predicted that native English speakers will benefit from the sans serif font, that native Korean speakers will benefit more from the sans serif font, and that native Chinese speakers will benefit the most from the sans serif font. Results from Experiment 1 showed that words and pseudowords written in a sans serif font were most readable for native English and native Korean speakers (although non-significantly for native English speakers), while words and pseudowords written in a serif font were most readable for native Chinese speakers. Results from Experiment 2 showed no differences in the readability of serif and sans serif fonts across native languages. Limitations and future directions are discussed. Keyword: Cognitive Psychology; Font; Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Lexical Decision Task; Native Language; Other Psychology; Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics; Readability; Sans Serif; Serif; Writing System URL: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1261&context=senproj_s2016 https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2016/6 BASE Hide details 2 Дискурс в свете нейрокогнитивистики АЛЕФИРЕНКО Н.Ф.. - : Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет», 2016 BASE Show details 3 On Jacques Lacan Psychosis Theory and ERPs Analysis Iurato, Giuseppe In: ISSN: 23955376 ; Journal of Biology and Nature ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00940449 ; Journal of Biology and Nature, International Knowledge Press, 2016 (2016) BASE Show details 4 Understanding Psychotic Speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky Chaika, Elaine In: Faculty Books (2016) BASE Show details 5 English and Lexigram Comprehension of Language-Trained Bonobos Rabinowitz, Andrea In: Iowa State University Anthropology Symposium (2016) BASE Show details 6 Exploratory and confirmatory analyses in sentence processing: A case study of number interference in German ... Nicenboim, Bruno; Vasishth, Shravan; Engelmann, Felix. - : PsyArXiv, 2016 BASE Show details 7 Environmental influences on infants’ native vowel discrimination: The case of talker number in daily life ... Bergmann, Christina; Cristia, Alejandrina. - : Open Science Framework, 2016 BASE Show details 8 Neural systems for auditory perception of lexical tones ... Kwok, Veronica P. Y.; Dan, Guo; Yakpo, Kofi. - : Zenodo, 2016 BASE Show details 9 Functionalism in the lexicon: Where is it, and how did it get there? ... Richie, Russell. - : PsyArXiv, 2016 BASE Show details 10 Neural systems for auditory perception of lexical tones ... Kwok, Veronica P. Y.; Dan, Guo; Yakpo, Kofi. - : Zenodo, 2016 BASE Show details 11 Expectation and Locality Effects in German Verb-final Structures ... Levy, Roger; Keller, Frank. - : PsyArXiv, 2016 BASE Show details 12 Quantum Anthropology: Man, Cultures, and Groups in a Quantum Perspective ... Trnka, Radek; Lorencova, Radmila. - : Open Science Framework, 2016 BASE Show details 13 Shifting ground: A definite puzzle in article production ... Hochstein, Lara; Barner, David. - : PsyArXiv, 2016 BASE Show details 14 Looking at feet. A neurolinguistic and constraint-based analysis of German word stress ... : Looking at feet. Eine neurolinguistische und constraint-basierte Analyse des deutschen Wortakzents ... Knaus, Johannes. - : Philipps-Universität Marburg, 2016 BASE Show details 15 Towards a Computational Model of Frame of Reference Alignment in Swedish Dialogue Dobnik, Simon; Howes, Christine; Kelleher, John D.... In: Conference papers (2016) BASE Show details 16 Investigating Word Order Processing Using Pupillometry and Event-Related Potentials Fernandez, Leigh Breakell. - : Sydney, Australia : Macquarie University, 2016 BASE Show details 17 Language and Cognition: Insight from Exceptional Cases Snyder, Anna In: Senior Honors Theses (2016) BASE Show details 18 Natural Language Processing of Forum Data: Modeling Social Interaction and Performance in STEM Learning Emory, Marissa; Pitte, Lucile In: Georgia State Undergraduate Research Conference (2016) BASE Show details 19 Functional Anatomy of Recognition of Chinese Multi-Character Words: Convergent Evidence from Effects of Transposable Nonwords, Lexicality, and Word Frequency Yu, Xi; Lin, Nan; Zhang, Mingxia. - : Public Library of Science, 2016 BASE Show details 20 Structuring the Argument Stockall, L; Bachrach, A; Roy, I. - : John Benjamins, 2016 BASE Show details Page: 1 2

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik IDS Mannheim OLC Linguistik UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog DNB Subject Category Language Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) Bibliographies BLLDB BDSL IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen IDS OBELEX meta MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection MPI for Psycholinguistics Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub Online resources Link directory Journal directory Database directory Dictionary directory Open access documents BASE 28 Linguistik-Repository IDS Publikationsserver Online dissertations Language Description Heritage