DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 6 of 6

1
Crowdsourcing Complex Language Resources: Playing to Annotate Dependency Syntax
In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING) ; https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01378980 ; International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Dec 2016, Osaka, Japan ; http://coling2016.anlp.jp/ (2016)
BASE
Show details
2
Crowdsourcing and curation: perspectives from biology and natural language processing.
Hirschman, Lynette; Fort, Karën; Boué, Stéphanie. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2016
BASE
Show details
3
Ethical Issues in Corpus Linguistics And Annotation: Pay Per Hit Does Not Affect Effective Hourly Rate For Linguistic Resource Development On Amazon Mechanical Turk
In: ETHics In Corpus collection, Annotation and Application workshop ; https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01324362 ; ETHics In Corpus collection, Annotation and Application workshop, May 2016, Portoroz, Slovenia (2016)
BASE
Show details
4
Éthique et traitement automatique des langues et de la parole : entre truismes et tabous
In: ISSN: 1248-9433 ; EISSN: 1965-0906 ; Revue TAL ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01422254 ; Revue TAL, ATALA (Association pour le Traitement Automatique des Langues), 2016, TAL et éthique, 57 (2), pp.7-19 ; https://www.atala.org/-Revue-TAL- (2016)
BASE
Show details
5
Crowdsourcing and curation: perspectives from biology and natural language processing
Abstract: Crowdsourcing is increasingly utilized for performing tasks in both natural language processing and biocuration. Although there have been many applications of crowdsourcing in these fields, there have been fewer high-level discussions of the methodology and its applicability to biocuration. This paper explores crowdsourcing for biocuration through several case studies that highlight different ways of leveraging ‘the crowd’; these raise issues about the kind(s) of expertise needed, the motivations of participants, and questions related to feasibility, cost and quality. The paper is an outgrowth of a panel session held at BioCreative V (Seville, September 9–11, 2015). The session consisted of four short talks, followed by a discussion. In their talks, the panelists explored the role of expertise and the potential to improve crowd performance by training; the challenge of decomposing tasks to make them amenable to crowdsourcing; and the capture of biological data and metadata through community editing.
Keyword: Original Article
URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw115
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976298/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27504010
BASE
Hide details
6
Ethical Issues in Corpus Linguistics And Annotation: Pay Per Hit Does Not Affect Effective Hourly Rate For Linguistic Resource Development On Amazon Mechanical Turk
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
Bibliographies
Linked Open Data catalogues
Online resources
Open access documents
6
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern