| 1 |
Word accent, phrase accent, and meter
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol 17 No 3 (2017): Special Volume: Reissue of Innovations in Linguistic Education, Volume 2 ; 1524-2110 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Review of Aliens and Linguists
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol 17 No 3 (2017): Special Volume: Reissue of Innovations in Linguistic Education, Volume 2 ; 1524-2110 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Phonemes and features
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol 17 No 3 (2017): Special Volume: Reissue of Innovations in Linguistic Education, Volume 2 ; 1524-2110 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Rule Interactions
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol 17 No 6 (2017): Special Volume: Reissue of Innovations in Linguistic Education, Volume 5 ; 1524-2110 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Elementary phonology from an advanced point of view
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol 17 No 4 (2017): Special Volume: Reissue of Innovations in Linguistic Education, Volume 3 ; 1524-2110 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
INTENSIVE AND QUOTATIVE ALL: SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This article presents a synchronic and diachronic investigation of the lexeme all in its intensifier and quotative functions. We delimit the new from the old functions of the lexeme and present a variationist account of all 's external and internal constraints in various syntactic environments. our analysis is based on a variety of data sets, which include traditional sociolinguistic interviews as well as data culled from internet searches and a new Google-based search tool. on the basis of these data sets, we show that intensifier all is not new but has expanded in syntactic environments. We further pinpoint the syntactic and semantic niches which all has appropriated for itself among California adolescents and compare its patterning with that of other intensifiers in our data and the data of other researchers. All 's extension to quotative function, however, is new, apparently originating in California in the 1980s. our investigation of its development spans across data sets from 15 years. using variable rule analysis and other quantitative techniques, we examine the distribution of quotative all vis-à-vis its competitor variants (including be like, say , and go ) and show that the constraints on quotative all have undergone a marked shift in recent years and that quotative all is in decline right now, after peaking in the 1990s.
|
|
Keyword:
Articles
|
|
URL: http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/cgi/content/short/82/1/3
https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2007-001
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
LISTENER PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIABLES: THE CASE OF (ING)
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~kbck/KCK_diss.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
1Stanford Semantics Fest
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.stanford.edu/~zwicky/CountingChad.pdf (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
The Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax: Four apparent counter-examples in French
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/~zwicky/4PPFS.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Exceptional degree markers: A puzzle in internal and external syntax
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Dealing Out Meaning: Fundamentals of Syntactic Constructions
|
|
|
|
In: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; BLS 20: General Session, Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore; 611-625 ; 2377-1666 ; 0363-2946 (1994)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Condition duplication, paradigm homonymy, and transconstructional constraints, Berkeley Linguistics Society 17
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/condition-duplication.pdf (1991)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Condition Duplication, Paradigm Homonymy, and Transconstructional Constraints
|
|
|
|
In: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; BLS 17: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure; 252-266 ; 2377-1666 ; 0363-2946 (1991)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Syntactic words and n*"1orphological words, simple and composite
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.stanford.edu/%7Ezwicky/syntactic-words.pdf (1990)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
What's become of derivations? Defaults and Invocations
|
|
|
|
In: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; BLS 15: General Session and Parasession on Theoretical Issues in Language Reconstruction; 303-322 ; 2377-1666 ; 0363-2946 (1989)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
