1 |
L2 consonant identification in noise : cross-language camparisons
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Dutch listeners' use of suprasegmental cues to English stress
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Perceptual compensation for voice assimilation of German fricatives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Number agreement in British and American english : disagreeing to agree collectively
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
First-language phonotactics in second-language listening
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Highly proficient German users of English as a second language, and native speakers of American English, listened to nonsense sequences and responded whenever they detected an embedded English word. The responses of both groups were equivalently facilitated by preceding context that both by English and by German phonotactic constraints forced a boundary at word onset (e.g., lecture was easier to detect in moinlecture than in gorklecture, and wish in yarlwish than in plookwish). The American L1 speakers’ responses were strongly facilitated, and the German listeners’ responses almost as strongly facilitated, by contexts that forced a boundary in English but not in German (thrarshlecture, glarshwish). The German listeners’ responses were significantly facilitated also by contexts that forced a boundary in German but not in English (moycelecture, loitwish), while L1 listeners were sensitive to acoustic boundary cues in these materials but not to the phonotactic sequences. The pattern of results suggests that proficient L2 listeners can acquire the phonotactic probabilities of an L2 and use them to good effect in segmenting continuous speech, but at the same time they may not be able to prevent interference from L1 constraints in their L2 listening.
|
|
Keyword:
170204 - Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension); english language; grammar; phonotactics; second language acquisition; speech
|
|
URL: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/34372 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2141003
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
13 |
Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Formant transitions in fricative identification : the role of native fricative inventory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Use of complex phonological patterns in speech processing : evidence from Korean
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|