1 |
Signs of Unmeaning. A Response to Sonesson's "What is Cognitive Semiotics?" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Signs of Unmeaning. A Response to Sonesson's "What is Cognitive Semiotics?" ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
⚘Fonseca on signs ("ID" I, 8-11) ☀ António Manuel Martins ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
⚘Fonseca on signs ("ID" I, 8-11) ☀ António Manuel Martins ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Semiótica de la actualidad y semióticas actuales ; Semiotic of current affairs and current semiotics
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Ingénierie sémiotique et modélisation diagrammatique ; Ingénierie sémiotique et modélisation diagrammatique: au-delà du modèle de Turing
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03450312 ; 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Ingénierie sémiotique et modélisation diagrammatique ; Ingénierie sémiotique et modélisation diagrammatique: au-delà du modèle de Turing
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03450312 ; 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Sémiotique discursive et textualité sémantique ; Sémiotique discursive et textualité sémantique: Le sens des sémèmes dans Le signe de la source d'Okoumba-Nkoghé
|
|
|
|
In: Les Grands Auteurs Gabonais ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03330460 ; Les Grands Auteurs Gabonais , 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Transformations – Signs and their Objects in Transition: 16th International Congress of the German Semiotics Society 2021; September 28 to October 2, 2021
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Spatial Language Use Predicts Spatial Memory of Children: Evidence from Sign, Speech, and Speech-plus-gesture ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Children’s use of Reasoning by Exclusion to Track Identities of Occluded Objects ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
What is a 'mechanism'? A distinction between two sub-types of mechanistic explanations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Reflected Boundary Drift Diffusion Model: A Double Responding Framework for Go/No-Go Paradigm ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Modelling the Sense-Making of Diagrams Using Image Schemas ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Iconicity refers to instances in which the form of language resembles its meaning (Perniss et al., 2010). The most prominent example in spoken language is onomatopoeia (e.g., woosh, which sounds like a gust of wind). Here we tested whether iconicity makes language more vivid by depicting the sensorimotor experiences being referred to. In Experiment 1, 44 participants read ten short passages (five iconic, five non-iconic), and then rated their vividness on several scales. These passages differed on two key words, which were either iconic (e.g., screech) or non-iconic (e.g., yell). We found no evidence that iconic language was more vivid. In Experiment 2, 199 participants each rated one longer passage that was either iconic or non-iconic (differing on eight key words). We found only marginal evidence of iconic language being more vivid, on subscales related to felt vividness. These results suggest that iconicity does not make written language more vivid. ...
|
|
Keyword:
Cognitive Linguistics; Cognitive Science; Semantics; Semiotics
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.48448/qx05-4363 https://underline.io/lecture/26904-is-iconic-language-more-vividquestion
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Judgement of political statements are influenced by speaker identity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|